Efficiency in operations and controlling costs are two of the top priorities for Jeff Fiegenschuh, Rochelle’s new city manager.
Another task at hand is finding ways to bridge the budget gap without relying on transfers from the landfill fund.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
ROCHELLE — Efficiency in operations and controlling costs are two of the top priorities for Jeff Fiegenschuh, Rochelle’s new city manager.
Another task at hand is finding ways to bridge the budget gap without relying on transfers from the landfill fund. At Monday evening’s council meeting, Fiegenschuh presented an option to help meet these goals.
One of the items on the agenda was a resolution to direct all street lighting costs to be assumed by Rochelle Municipal Utilities and be removed as an expense of the general fund.
“Shortly after being hired I began looking into ways of solving the budget problems,” Fiegenschuh explained. “One of the things I found involved RMU billing the general fund for the street lighting costs.”
Currently there is a levy in place with a maximum of $.05/$100 EAV that generates $110,000 each year. The billing cost to the general fund associated with street lighting last year was about $155,000, with the remainder coming from the Motor Fuel Tax and the general levy.
After further research, Fiegenschuh discovered more than 80 percent of the communities surveyed that have their own utilities classify this expense as a cost of doing business.
At the council meeting, Fiegenschuh suggested the money levied could either be utilized elsewhere, such as pension costs or general property insurance costs, or simply eliminate the levy altogether.
“What I wanted to reassure everybody is we are not transferring money out of the electrical department or the electrical fund to the general fund,” Fiegenschuh added. “The reason I am proposing this isn’t a budget gimmick, it just seems to me one of the benefits of owning your own electric utility is covering some of those costs and then allowing the general fund to focus more of its resources to what it needs like pension and public safety costs.”
Before coming to a vote, Fiegenschuh added that if council voted to approve the resolution, the write off would begin in January.
Council voted unanimously to approve the resolution.
Health insurance
Along the same lines to cut operating costs, Fiegenshuh also suggested council consider combining with a health benefits cooperative to save costs — something the city of Rantoul, Illinois did during his employment there. By joining a larger pool of employees covered under health insurance, Rantoul’s premiums were 25 percent lower and first year renewals were in single digits.