ROCHELLE — Budget concerns have been at the forefront for Rochelle city officials of late and Monday night talks ensued on how to close a $1.2 million deficit gap going into 2017.
Rochelle …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
ROCHELLE — Budget concerns have been at the forefront for Rochelle city officials of late and Monday night talks ensued on how to close a $1.2 million deficit gap going into 2017.
Rochelle City Council will decide whether to approve the modified calendar-year budget presented Monday night or to keep the existing fiscal year budget that expires Apr. 30, 2017.
City Manager David Plyman presented the budget that included items stricken from the original one presented two weeks ago. Cuts of nearly $700,000 brought the original deficit down from over $1.2 million to $513,800, and Plyman then suggested transferring landfill tip fee funds to balance the general fund.
Monday evening’s discussion was similar to last month’s budget talks as council members once again expressed concerns relying on landfill transfer funds to balance the budget.
During his presentation, Plyman said after “heart to heart” discussions with city staff regarding personnel and equipment, several items were adjusted, or eliminated for the proposed calendar year budget.
As another approach at deficit reduction, Plyman suggested partnering with neighboring communities on services as a way to reduce costs.
“This represents a pretty meaningful decrease,” Plyman said. “This doesn’t include utilization or reorganization of personnel. We need to pursue what makes sense — finding strategic partners and other units of government where we can share resources, manpower and services. We can reach out to neighbors to see if we can find options for reduced personnel costs.”
Plyman discussed internal reorganizations already implemented in the street department, human resources, and the police department, along with employees nearing retirement. Plyman requested permission from council to “sit down with those employees and figure out their plans.”