I recently read a great piece about how horrible meetings are. All I could do was say a silent, “amen, brother.”
For most of my career in journalism, I have been fortunate to work in newsrooms, where the meetings are limited. Daily newspapers have a news meeting every day, but it is usually pretty short. When I was an editor at daily newspapers, I tried to keep ours to 15 minutes or so.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
I recently read a great piece about how horrible meetings are. All I could do was say a silent, “amen, brother.”
For most of my career in journalism, I have been fortunate to work in newsrooms, where the meetings are limited. Daily newspapers have a news meeting every day, but it is usually pretty short. When I was an editor at daily newspapers, I tried to keep ours to 15 minutes or so.
If people are ready for the meeting, it shouldn’t take long.
We also had weekly planning meetings. But even for those we made sure everyone was prepared with ideas ahead of time so those meetings were kept to less than a half hour.
The last thing I wanted to do was take up the valuable time of reporters and editors with meetings.
In a past position I went to work at corporate for a newspaper company. I was stuck in meeting hell often – way too often. Meetings can really suck the fun out of life very quickly.
I came to realize a few things about the reality of meetings: